Title

Site Study: Giant hogweed control on the Stuartfield Burn, South Ugie Water, Aberdeenshire

Summary

The Stuartfield Burn is a tributary of the South Ugie Water running through the village of Stuartfield in Aberdeenshire.  In 2018 the site was identified as the most upstream point of giant hogweed on the burn and a potentially significant seed source of giant hogweed infestations downstream to the South Ugie Water.  Giant hogweed had become established around Stuartfield and was outcompeting native vegetation, increasing the risk of bank erosion and posing a human health hazard.  Control was needed to prevent further spread of the plant around the village and limit seed dispersal into the South Ugie Water.

Working with landowners and volunteers, the Scottish Invasive Species Initiative managed giant hogweed control at this site from 2018-2021. Approximately 2.2km of river length was covered, totalling 4.4km of riverbank.  This work has significantly reduced the abundance of giant hogweed on the site and, consequently, the time and chemical volume necessary for annual control.

In 2022, the Scottish Invasive Species Initiative intends to discuss the handover of management at the site to local landowners so that control can continue there after the project ends in October 2022. Project staff will continue to monitor the site and provide advice and support when needed. Encouraging progress has been made but monitoring and control work will be needed for several years to eradicate the plant, exhaust the seedbank at the site and prevent further spread of seeds downstream into the South Ugie Water.

1. Site description

The Stuartfield Burn site is a 2.2km stretch of burn running through Stuartfield village in Aberdeenshire (see Map 1 below).  Land use is varied along the banks and includes residential gardens, pastures, unimproved grassland and conifer plantation.

The upper limit of the site starts above West Knock Farm (grid reference: NJ 98144 45195) and ends at the confluence with the South Ugie Water (grid reference: NJ 97910 46830).  Ownership is shared by a number of individuals - with no single owner having overall responsibility of the site.  In total, giant hogweed has been controlled on approximately 4.4km of riverbank, covering both banks of the 2.2km river section.

Within the Scottish Invasive Species Initiative partnership, the Ugie catchment is covered by the Deveron, Bogie and Isla Rivers Charitable Trust.

Map 1 – Location of giant hogweed control sites on the Stuartfield Burn

Map of Stuartfield burn and village showing limits of treatment sites

2. Background

This site marks the uppermost extent of giant hogweed on the Stuartfield Burn and is one of the key seed sources for the South Ugie Water. The origin of the plant is unknown but it may historically have escaped from a garden and/or been spread by agricultural activities.  It is now present at a number of locations downstream and is well established in the catchment.

The Stuartfield Burn site was identified for control by the Scottish Invasive Species Initiative in 2018 and the site was further extended upstream in 2019.  At that time giant hogweed was present throughout the site - being the most abundant species in some areas and growing alongside native vegetation elsewhere.  In the worst areas, giant hogweed was successfully outcompeting other ground flora and leaving banks vulnerable to erosion when winter die back exposed bare soil.  If left untreated the plant was likely to become dominant in already established locations and spread further downstream to less affected areas.

After the Scottish Invasive Species Initiative alerted them to the issue - highlighting the importance of tackling infestations and preventing further spread downstream - two major landowners agreed to work with the project to control plants on their land.  In other areas, initial control was carried out by project staff and volunteers. 

3. Management works

Giant hogweed was first treated on the site in 2018, followed by annual control in 2019, 2020 and 2021. Initially, control started one pasture above Stuartfield village and continued downstream to the confluence with the South Ugie Water.  In 2019, additional giant hogweed plants were found further upstream and so the site boundary was extended to include these.  The landowner was alerted to the discovery and agreed to carry out control. 

Two control methods were used - foliar spraying and manual cutting of flowering heads to prevent seeding. Manual cutting was combined with herbicide application (to remaining leaves and into hollow stem) to prevent regrowth.  In 2021, after three years of control, no giant hogweed plants reached the flowering stage and control could be carried out by foliar spray alone. Table 1 (below) shows a summary of the control treatments.

Table 1 – Summary of control treatments 

Year   Invasive Species   Work Completed by   Control Work – Date and Method 
             
2018   Giant Hogweed   Project staff, land managers   July – foliar spray and cutting
2019   Giant Hogweed   Project staff, volunteers,    land managers   July – foliar spray and cutting
2020   Giant Hogweed   Project staff, land managers   July – foliar spray and cutting
2021   Giant Hogweed   Project staff, land managers   July – foliar spray 

4. Results

4.1 Invasive species abundance

Monitoring was undertaken at six representative points within the site from 2018/2019 to 2021. The abundance of giant hogweed was measured using the DAFOR scale*. Recorded abundance of giant hogweed at these points is shown in Table 2 below. 

Before control work, the abundance of giant hogweed was either ‘dominant’, ‘abundant’ or ‘frequent’. Following 2 or 3 years of treatment in 2018, 2019 and 2020, a reduction in abundance was observed at all monitoring points. By 2021 abundance had reduced to ‘frequent’, ‘occasional’ or ‘rare’ at the monitoring points, with only one bank at one monitoring point showing ‘abundant’ due to the existing seedbank. This is shown by the recorded abundances in Table 2 at monitoring points and fixed-point photography at each site (see Figures 1a, 1b, 2a and 2b below).

Table 2 - Annual giant hogweed abundance from DAFOR* surveys (2018 – 2021) at Stuartfield Burn. Note: Site 1 was not discovered and site 3 not monitored until 2019.

Site Name Giant hogweed abundance by year (DAFOR* scale)
  2018 2019 2020 2021
Stuartfield Burn 1a (right bank) - D A O
Stuartfield Burn 1b (left bank) - D A F
Stuartfield Burn 2a (right bank) D A O O
Stuartfield Burn 2b (left bank) A A F R
Stuartfield Burn 3a (right bank) - F O A
Stuartfield Burn 3b (left bank) - F R O

 

* - DAFOR Scale of abundance – D = Dominant (50 – 100% cover), A = Abundant (30 – 50% cover), F = Frequent (15 – 30% cover), O = Occasional (5 – 15 % cover), R = Rare (<5% cover)

Figure 1a.
Stuartfield Burn 2019 site 1 – prior to 2019 control
  Figure 1b.
Stuartfield Burn 2021 site 1 – after 2021 control 
Flowering giant hogweed along Stuartfield burn   Same section of Stuartfield burn clear of giant hogweed
     
Figure 2a. 
Stuartfield Burn 2018 site 2 – prior to 2018 control
  Figure 2b.
Stuartfield Burn 2021 site 2 – after 2021 control
Wooded area on Stuartfield burn with hogweed along burn edges   Same wooded area on Stuartfield burn with no visible hogweed

4.2 Chemical usage

In each year of treatment glyphosate (RoundUp Provantage 480mg/l) was applied by knapsack sprayer at a concentration of 20ml per litre. The volume of glyphosate used per year is shown in Table 3 below.

The increase in glyphosate used in 2019 was due to the discovery and treatment of a new area. Following this, chemical volume decreased each year.

Table 3 – Volume of glyphosate used to control giant hogweed at Stuartfield Burn (2018 – 2021)
 

Site Name Glyphosate used (litres)
  2018 2019 2020 2021
Stuartfield Burn 1.6 2 0.88 0.44

4.3 People effort

Control work was carried out by landowners and by Scottish Invasive Species Initiative staff and volunteers. Table 4 (below) shows the people hours required to control giant hogweed each year.  The increase in hours spent on control in 2019 was due to the new area of giant hogweed that was discovered and treated in that year - this area was not part of the work programme in 2018.

Table 4 – People hours needed to control giant hogweed at Stuartfield burn (2018 – 2021)Table 4 – People hours needed to control giant hogweed at Stuartfield burn (2018 – 2021)

Site Name Hours of control work by year 
  2018 2019 2020 2021
Stuartfield Burn 10 26 11.5 4.5

5. Conclusions and Progress Made

Control measures taken along the Stuartfield Burn since 2018 have reduced giant hogweed abundance at the site and the time and chemical volume required for annual control.

A significant reduction in abundance was observed at the monitoring sites from 2018 to 2021 (see Table 2 and Figures 1a, 1b, 2a and 2b). Giant hogweed was recorded at the majority of sites as ‘rare’, ‘frequent’ or ‘occasional’ in 2021, following annual control since 2018/2019 when it was recorded as ’dominant’, ‘abundant’ or ‘frequent’.

The time and chemical volume required for control reduced from 2019 onwards, after the upper source of giant hogweed was discovered and included in control efforts (see Tables 3 and 4).  Chemical volume and hours spent on control reduced by 78% and 83% respectively between 2019 and 2021.

This is positive progress but control will be required at the site for a number of years to further reduce abundance of the plant and exhaust the extensive seedbank.  Ongoing efforts will prevent flowering plants adding to the seedbank and spreading additional seeds further downstream and into the South Ugie Water where treatment is ongoing at other sites.  Promising recolonization of native flora has been observed in many of the sites which will hopefully help to suppress the emergence and growth of any giant hogweed seedlings. 

6. Next Steps

Giant hogweed seedlings will emerge at the Stuartfield Burn site in 2022, and in subsequent years, due to the persistent seedbank in the soil.  For progress to continue at this site, annual control and monitoring will be required to prevent giant hogweed plants maturing and setting and dispersing seeds, as this would  replenish the seedbank and further spread giant hogweed downstream.  In time, with consistent control effort, the existing seedbank will be diminished and then exhausted at the site.

In 2022, the site will be monitored by project staff but the intention is that control will mostly be carried out by local land owners and managers - now that this work is of a more manageable scale after control by the project.  This transition and transfer of management responsibility will allow future giant hogweed control work to target sites downstream in the knowledge that the Stuartfield Burn will be controlled by relevant land managers.

Project staff will initiate discussions with landowners and managers to formalise this handover.  Securing these agreements will be essential to safeguard the progress made at this site as the Scottish Invasive Species Initiative is due to end in October 2022. Furthermore, effective control and landowner agreements downstream are likely to depend on assurances that upstream sources of giant hogweed are being actively managed and controlled.

Further information

Contact: [email protected] 

Download this Case Study as a PDF

April